@Article{
AUTHOR = {Reich, Stephen Reich},
TITLE = {How Ideology, Not Science, Determined Teaching Children to Read in Ontario},
JOURNAL = {Journal of Controversial Ideas},
VOLUME = {5},
YEAR = {2025},
NUMBER = {1},
PAGES = {0--0},
URL = {https://www.journalofcontroversialideas.org/article/5/1/288},
ISSN = {2694-5991},
ABSTRACT = {This article exposes the sabotage of a much-needed, empirically based reform to reading instruction by an educational bureaucracy captured by a highly ideological, but evidence-poor contemporary Critical Theory. In 2023, Ontario’s Ministry of Education (Ministry) replaced its 2006 elementary language curriculum in response to the Human Rights Commission’s Right to Read Report, accusing the province of neglecting empirically tested Learning Science-based approaches, by unwarranted emphasis on socio-cultural concerns. Employing a bibliometric terminology-mining approach as a construct representing paradigmatic priorities in policy-making, I found that while the use of Learning Science terminology doubled from the old curriculum, Critical Theory language increased by 355.24%, and use of the term identity increased by 2,233.87%, indicating a resistance to prioritizing literacy over ideology. I attribute this to agenda-setting in the bureaucracy, promoting decontextualized American narratives and grievances nurtured in scholarship more concerned with copying American trends than solving Canadian education concerns. Despite alarming literacy trends, the Ministry remains ideologically intransigent in its adherence to Critical Theory, merely engaging in a Learning Science pretence that may temporarily deceive the public, but that will continue to negatively affect children’s literacy into the future.},
DOI = {10.63466/jci05010002}
}